Compare and Constrast Classical China and Classical India

Though they had some different qualities, Classical china and India were real similar. The complexities of both India and chinas social hierarchy systems were very different. However their religious views and ideas were similar, and they both began to decline solely were competent to recover and maintain stability. Both chinaware and India utilise social hierarchy systems, but they were used differently. India used a very strict system c altogethered Varna, or the caste system. People only associated with people in their class. Marriage outside of your class and helping people in lower classes was absolutely forbidden.People couldnt flat eat or drink with people outside of their class. The Chinese rules of social hierarchy were very different. The Chinese believed in reciprocal respect within relationships. For example, the ruler respects the subject and the subject respects the ruler. other major difference was the specific levels of the social ladder. The caste system of In dia had four basic levels the Brahmins (priests), catched by the Kshatriyas (warriors), whence the Vaishyas (work people), and finally the Shudras (peasants).All four of these castes were divided into subgroups called jati. This system was very complex and stratified and a person could non change castes. The Chinese only had three steps on their social ladder. On top was the amend bureaucrats and landowners. The peasants and the urban artisans were in the middle class and the mean or meaningless people were at the bottom. Priests in India were considered very postful and they were at the top of society. The Classical Chinese emperors used a centralized organized religion called Confucianism and a priest class wasnt necessary.There was other religions in China but the priests were isolated from the relief of the population. The Chinese social system was very simple and the Indian caste system was more specific. India and China used different hierarchy systems, but they had simi lar religious views and ideas. At this point in epoch Hinduism was very popular in India and the Chinese emperors stressed confucian ideas. Hinduism and Confucianism were very similar. In both religions thither was no specific gods to be worshiped, but there was religious shrines.People were obedient to confucianism because it stressed respect to all people. The goal of Hinduism was to free your soul and reach moksha. In order to do so people had to follow the rules and do the right thing. Confucianism and Hinduism worked because all people benefited from them. Another major similarity of India and China was the cause and effects of the declines of their golden ages. Both India and China had strong enough civilizations to withstand the challenges they faced and not completely fall.Because of Chinas strong political system and because of Indias uniform religion, both civilizations were able to recover and animise themselves. Nomadic invaders attacked both civilizations and this wa s a setback but strong emperors helped regain order. The strength of the political systems was besides challenged. Arab invaders tried to convert India to Islam but failed because Indian religious leaders worked to strengthen HInduism. In China bureaucrats became indulge and started fighting for power and assassinating each other.Thankfully the Sui and Tang dynasties worked to regain power and they restored Confucianism because they knew it worked in the past. India and China lost power but they were able to maintain stability. China and India had some qualities that contrast each other, but the two civilizations were very similar. Their social hierarchy systems were different, but they shared common religious views and ideas, they both suffered a decline but they were able to recover and maintain stability.